Green Party Jill Stein Presents Herself Potential Nuclear War With Russia

With voter dissatisfaction in especially high for the two major parties numbers, campaigns of candidates from third they have received increased media attention and support the Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson receives an average of 6.4 percent and Green Party candidate Jill Stein at 2.1 percent, according to RealClearPolitics. Johnson and Stein both ran in 2012, and neither could reach 1 percent.

While Johnson and Stein have virtually no chance of winning the general election, the amount of media attention they receive often curse against bipartisanship and attack the two main candidates. Wednesday, Stein, who is on the ballot in 46 states, has maintained its offensive Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton in an interview on C-SPAN, suggesting that the former Secretary of State directs the US a nuclear war with Russia, which did not materialize with the former Soviet Union, including the height of the arms race during the Cold War.

"Now is Hillary Clinton, who wants to start an air war with Russia on Syria calling for a no-fly zone," Stein said. "We have 2,000 nuclear missiles on alert. And Gorbachev, former prime minister of the Soviet Union, that we are closer to a nuclear war we have ever been. "With Clinton, we could fall into a nuclear war very quickly declared its policy of Syria.

"So I will not sleep well at night if elected Donald Trump, but I sure do not sleep well at night if elected Hillary Clinton. Fortunately, we have no choice other than these two candidates are both promoting murderous policies .

"But on the question of war and nuclear weapons, and the possibility of nuclear war actually it is the Hillary of policies that are much scarier than Donald Trump, who will not go to war with Russia. Wants search for mixed forms of work, which is the way we should go.

Stein seemed to share the feelings of Russian President Vladimir Putin, who recently told Reuters that Trump was the only person able to cool tension between the US and Russia. Trump, meanwhile, was economically tied to Russia, which could create a conflict of interests between Washington and the Kremlin Trump should win in November.

But Clinton is dragging the US in a nuclear war? Based on Clinton's comments, some may consider this statement is an important section.

In a discussion of the primary with Sen. Bernie Sanders in April, Clinton did express the desire for a no-fly zone, but stopped far from pleading for any type of military conflict between the US and Russia, including the air war. "So I think it's fair to look at where we are today in Syria and yes, I still maintaining a no-fly zone, because I think we need to house the Syrians poor fleeing both Assad and Isis and therefore have a place they can be safe. "

October 2015 interview with Rachel Maddow IN MSNBC-Clinton was asked about the possibility of shooting down a Russian plane if mounted on a no-fly zone.

"Well, this is a hypothesis that I think there are many steps you have to go through and the decisions that have to do before you even get to that. Has NATO have warned the Russians that were invading Turkish airspace -a NATO ally, and were taken out, "Clinton said.

"Part of the reason why I have proposed a no-fly zone as a coalition effort, not a solo effort in the US, is having talks with the Russians at the table. Because the goal of any fly zone is not only to provide safe for Syrians who should not be in the race or are still bombed by Assad, now supported by Russian areas, but to get the leverage to get everyone to the table to try to create a ceasefire, including Assad's forces, the Russians and the Iranians, too.

"One of the ways to do that, diplomatically, is that it gets a couple of ideas like" Let's talk about a no-fly zone and infact I REALLY thought it was interesting you know, in another aspect of the issue here, Putin is saying, 'OK, now we can talk diplomatically because we will change the situation on the ground ", and so you should come and diplomatic consultation.

I think the no-fly zone which the Turks have long requested and humanitarian organizations, is a device and a potential result to see how we can bring people to the table.

And the Russians would certainly be noticed. There were military discussions now, as they say, conflict "airspace. So I think it would be very unlikely, if done the right way.